Not all women are looking for the One (or believe in the One for that matter), and not all women have considered the possibilities.

He was such a great man in so many ways & his reasons for not wanting kids were so sensible that I was willing to imagine a kid-free future. Besides, if you keep getting older you’ll basically be dating women past that age anyway.

These choices mainly apply to two sets of people: You’re in a minority in your preferences if you were into BDSM, or were an animal activist, or gave half your earnings to the Pentecostal Church.

dating site for singles without children-3dating site for singles without children-70

Dating site for singles without children video

Act with integrity and his pool of dateable women diminishes considerably.

This brings up a larger point that I’ve wanted to make for a long time: People who are not “mainstream” have some very tough choices to make in dating.

So if you’re in one of the above minorities and you’re faced with a frustrating situation, you have a choice: Keep doing what you’re doing, or change. I just have to point out the obvious: If you’re only open to dating 5% of the population – you’re going to have a harder time finding love. The vegan could tolerate a man who eats chicken and eggs.

The shorter man could be open to heavier women, the older woman to older men.

I know you don’t have a magic wand, so I just have to play the hand I’ve been dealt.

I’m willing to take a risk by contacting women who list that they are “not sure” about wanting children.

A Jewish rocker with dreadlocks who wants to be with a Jewish woman. You can probably add other things to this list, including overweight women, older women, short men, and poor men.

These are not choices, but they are groups that face longer odds because they don’t fit into many people’s preferences. The Jewish rocker could cut his hair to appeal to his demographic.

Simple exercise: Ask yourself what percent of people are ALSO (hardcore bikers, jobless backpackers, Buddhists who don’t believe in possessions)?